<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.bambi.florian.world/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Day_9</id>
		<title>Day 9 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.bambi.florian.world/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Day_9"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.bambi.florian.world/index.php?title=Day_9&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-09T07:21:54Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.28.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.bambi.florian.world/index.php?title=Day_9&amp;diff=163&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Florian: Created page with &quot;= LOG =  Fixed Obstacle Avoidance!!  # Main error was the angle: to obtain a mean angle from the vector of obstacles, we cannot make a mean value from the angle values: #* if...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.bambi.florian.world/index.php?title=Day_9&amp;diff=163&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2018-08-13T15:25:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;= LOG =  Fixed Obstacle Avoidance!!  # Main error was the angle: to obtain a mean angle from the vector of obstacles, we cannot make a mean value from the angle values: #* if...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;= LOG =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixed Obstacle Avoidance!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Main error was the angle: to obtain a mean angle from the vector of obstacles, we cannot make a mean value from the angle values:&lt;br /&gt;
#* if there are some at 5° and some at 355° the mean value should be zero, not 180°&lt;br /&gt;
#* --&amp;gt; fixed using mean values of reaction forces, and then calculating the angle using arctan2&lt;br /&gt;
# Evaluated if to use a PID controller --&amp;gt; desired distance from obstacle 5m, measured distance given&lt;br /&gt;
#* Decided to DO NOT so, because integral wouldn't discharge&lt;br /&gt;
#* We only have limited range measurable, which means we don't see the actual distance if it is larger&lt;br /&gt;
#* Furthermore we do not want to have a fixed obstacle distance of 5m, but of AT LEAST 5m, so controller wouldn't make any sens&lt;br /&gt;
# Decided to keep NON-LINEAR control action, i.e. governed by the inverse of the obstacle distance&lt;br /&gt;
# By smoothing repulsive force action with a Low-Pass (cut-off freq = 1Mhz) we obtained satisfying results FOR OUR USE CASE&lt;br /&gt;
#* Decided to NOT investigate further papers and NOT implement a more sophisticated obstacle avoidance algorithm, because it is not our use case.&lt;br /&gt;
#* i.e. obstacle should be an exceptional case during our mission, where a rudimentary O.A. behavior is good enough&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Florian</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>